Rochford District Core Strategy Regulation 26 Draft
Search representations
Results for Defence Estates search
New searchComment
Rochford District Core Strategy Regulation 26 Draft
4.5 Housing Numbers & Phasing
Representation ID: 27
Received: 06/06/2007
Respondent: Defence Estates
As a general rule there will be a need to develop or enhance establishments to meet the new requirements of the Armed Forces. It is considered that where there is a site used for defence purposes, development should be permitted, so long as it is necessary for defence purposes and is in keeping with the character and appearance of the site. General policies must not therefore restrict military use development of New Ranges, Shoeburyness.
I would refer to your letter of 21st May giving MOD the opportunity to comment on the above consultation.
To clarify the position of Defence Estates, I confirm that we are advisers for the MOD, and as such, undertake the estate management role for the Shoeburyness establishment.
You will be aware that the only reason MOD holds property is to provide for or support the front line military capability. Therefore as a general rule there will be a need to develop or enhance establishments to meet the new requirements of the Armed Forces. It is considered that where there is a site used for defence purposes, development should be permitted, so long as it is necessary for defence purposes and is in keeping with the character and appearance of the site.
General policies must not therefore restrict military use development of New Ranges, Shoeburyness.
The LDF should acknowledge the role of Defence Establishments and the need to facilitate the ongoing use and future development of the sites for military purposes.
It is hoped that the above comments are of assistance in developing the Local Development Framework.