Q58c. Are there areas in Hockley and Hawkwell that development should generally be presumed appropriate?

Showing comments and forms 1 to 30 of 56

Support

New Local Plan: Spatial Options Document 2021

Representation ID: 37485

Received: 28/07/2021

Respondent: Mr Neil Stone

Representation Summary:

All areas of agricultural land and woodland should be protected from development as they are integral to the feel of the village and are not suitable for housing. They are used frequently by local residents for recreation.

Full text:

All areas of agricultural land and woodland should be protected from development as they are integral to the feel of the village and are not suitable for housing. They are used frequently by local residents for recreation.

Object

New Local Plan: Spatial Options Document 2021

Representation ID: 37497

Received: 28/07/2021

Respondent: mr Christopher Arnold

Representation Summary:

There is very little space left in Hockley that is appropriate, maybe if the council stopped approving massive houses for the mega rich they would be able to fit smaller more appropriate properties on the land! The only place in Hockley that I would build would be on the other side of Plumberow down towards lower road

Full text:

There is very little space left in Hockley that is appropriate, maybe if the council stopped approving massive houses for the mega rich they would be able to fit smaller more appropriate properties on the land! The only place in Hockley that I would build would be on the other side of Plumberow down towards lower road

Object

New Local Plan: Spatial Options Document 2021

Representation ID: 37569

Received: 01/08/2021

Respondent: Mr Ben Miller

Representation Summary:

Hockley is just fine as it is. I have no problem with an existing plot of land currently being used for housing to be turned into newer housing. But no greenbelt sites – that is to say no countryside – should be turned in housing estates.

Full text:

Hockley is just fine as it is. I have no problem with an existing plot of land currently being used for housing to be turned into newer housing. But no greenbelt sites – that is to say no countryside – should be turned in housing estates.

Support

New Local Plan: Spatial Options Document 2021

Representation ID: 37576

Received: 02/08/2021

Respondent: Mrs Tricia Wilton

Representation Summary:

Additional affordable housing should be build in Hockley

Full text:

Additional affordable housing should be build in Hockley

Support

New Local Plan: Spatial Options Document 2021

Representation ID: 37722

Received: 07/08/2021

Respondent: N/A

Representation Summary:

CFS262 is the only one i would actively support (small infill development) as this could be managed & contained on a small scale, bring less traffic & commotion than a fully working business on the plot. Most of the other areas are large green fields which would bring hundreds (if not thousands) of cars & people to the area.

Full text:

CFS262 is the only one i would actively support (small infill development) as this could be managed & contained on a small scale, bring less traffic & commotion than a fully working business on the plot. Most of the other areas are large green fields which would bring hundreds (if not thousands) of cars & people to the area.

Object

New Local Plan: Spatial Options Document 2021

Representation ID: 37798

Received: 09/08/2021

Respondent: Mr Peter Osborne

Representation Summary:

Too much building here at the moment!

Full text:

Too much building here at the moment!

Comment

New Local Plan: Spatial Options Document 2021

Representation ID: 37831

Received: 10/08/2021

Respondent: Mr Kevin James

Representation Summary:

The area opposite Ashingdon school would be ideal for development with little impact to the environment in the area.

Full text:

The area opposite Ashingdon school would be ideal for development with little impact to the environment in the area.

Comment

New Local Plan: Spatial Options Document 2021

Representation ID: 37867

Received: 11/08/2021

Respondent: Mrs Alice Southern

Representation Summary:

The site is already in use and contains several buildings; however the majority of the site is now in disrepair so detract from the character of the area. The redevelopment of this site would enhance the site and provide a suitable mix of housing for local residents.

Full text:

The site is already in use and contains several buildings; however the majority of the site is now in disrepair so detract from the character of the area. The redevelopment of this site would enhance the site and provide a suitable mix of housing for local residents.

Support

New Local Plan: Spatial Options Document 2021

Representation ID: 37870

Received: 11/08/2021

Respondent: Mr Craig Southern

Representation Summary:

CFS262 this area would be a perfect area to develop into addition housing

Full text:

CFS262 this area would be a perfect area to develop into addition housing

Support

New Local Plan: Spatial Options Document 2021

Representation ID: 37871

Received: 11/08/2021

Respondent: Mr Craig Southern

Representation Summary:

CFS262 - this area needs to be developed to maintain a well Hockley and Hawkwell as a sought after area.

Full text:

CFS262 - this area needs to be developed to maintain a well Hockley and Hawkwell as a sought after area.

Support

New Local Plan: Spatial Options Document 2021

Representation ID: 37875

Received: 12/08/2021

Respondent: Eastway Homes Limited

Representation Summary:

CFS264 Address: Land at Greenacres Nursery, Hockley
CFS242 Address: 47 Victor Gardens, Hockley, SS5 4DS
CFS262 Address: Land at Rawal Pindi Nurseries, Hawkwell
CFS024 Address: Land north of Merryfields Avenue, Hockley
CFS017 Address: Greenacres, Victor Gardens, Hawkwell
CFS017 Address: Greenacres, Victor Gardens, Hawkwell

All of these potetial sites would only be an extension of what is already there in the immediate surrounding area.

Full text:

CFS264 Address: Land at Greenacres Nursery, Hockley
CFS242 Address: 47 Victor Gardens, Hockley, SS5 4DS
CFS262 Address: Land at Rawal Pindi Nurseries, Hawkwell
CFS024 Address: Land north of Merryfields Avenue, Hockley
CFS017 Address: Greenacres, Victor Gardens, Hawkwell
CFS017 Address: Greenacres, Victor Gardens, Hawkwell

All of these potetial sites would only be an extension of what is already there in the immediate surrounding area.

Object

New Local Plan: Spatial Options Document 2021

Representation ID: 38140

Received: 25/08/2021

Respondent: Mrs geraldine suskins

Representation Summary:

There are no areas that i can see that would be appropriate for development in the loacl Haockley/Hawkwell area

Full text:

There are no areas that i can see that would be appropriate for development in the loacl Haockley/Hawkwell area

Object

New Local Plan: Spatial Options Document 2021

Representation ID: 38238

Received: 27/08/2021

Respondent: Mr Mark Trevallion

Representation Summary:

Ruining green belt land. Infrastructure & schools not in place to cope. Popular location for the local community to enjoy, if this is gone then there is not much left in the town.

Full text:

Ruining green belt land. Infrastructure & schools not in place to cope. Popular location for the local community to enjoy, if this is gone then there is not much left in the town.

Object

New Local Plan: Spatial Options Document 2021

Representation ID: 38243

Received: 27/08/2021

Respondent: Mr Mark Trevallion

Representation Summary:

Ruining green belt land. Infrastructure & schools not in place to cope. Popular location for the local community to enjoy, if this is gone then there is not much left in the town.

Full text:

Ruining green belt land. Infrastructure & schools not in place to cope. Popular location for the local community to enjoy, if this is gone then there is not much left in the town.

Object

New Local Plan: Spatial Options Document 2021

Representation ID: 38248

Received: 27/08/2021

Respondent: Mr Mark Trevallion

Representation Summary:

Ruining green belt land. Infrastructure & schools not in place to cope. Popular location for the local community to enjoy, if this is gone then there is not much left in the town.

Full text:

Ruining green belt land. Infrastructure & schools not in place to cope. Popular location for the local community to enjoy, if this is gone then there is not much left in the town.

Object

New Local Plan: Spatial Options Document 2021

Representation ID: 38253

Received: 28/08/2021

Respondent: Mr michael suskins

Representation Summary:

No areas in or around Hockley are viable for development, as there is insufficient infrastructure in place for the current population let alone more

Full text:

No areas in or around Hockley are viable for development, as there is insufficient infrastructure in place for the current population let alone more

Object

New Local Plan: Spatial Options Document 2021

Representation ID: 38344

Received: 01/09/2021

Respondent: Mrs Kathleen Chantry

Representation Summary:

I have noticed over a number of years that often when one property is demolished it is replaced by more than one, sometimes many more.

Full text:

I have noticed over a number of years that often when one property is demolished it is replaced by more than one, sometimes many more.

Comment

New Local Plan: Spatial Options Document 2021

Representation ID: 38359

Received: 01/09/2021

Respondent: Mrs Jacqueline Hallett

Representation Summary:

I am against housing development in Hockley - our roads are full of potholes, it takes around 20 minutes to get into Rayleigh, on a good day - no thought has been given to the knock-on effect of more housing ... just more money/backhanders in the pockets of those who "approve" such building to go ahead.

Full text:

I am against housing development in Hockley - our roads are full of potholes, it takes around 20 minutes to get into Rayleigh, on a good day - no thought has been given to the knock-on effect of more housing ... just more money/backhanders in the pockets of those who "approve" such building to go ahead.

Support

New Local Plan: Spatial Options Document 2021

Representation ID: 38380

Received: 02/09/2021

Respondent: Mr Michael Pryor

Representation Summary:

As above the High St and shops could use some investment to modernise and encourage new businesses.

Full text:

As above the High St and shops could use some investment to modernise and encourage new businesses.

Comment

New Local Plan: Spatial Options Document 2021

Representation ID: 38387

Received: 02/09/2021

Respondent: Mrs Christine Barker

Representation Summary:

Over the past few years there has been more than enough developments initiated and completed sadly the infrastructure has not been of the same level.

Full text:

Over the past few years there has been more than enough developments initiated and completed sadly the infrastructure has not been of the same level.

Object

New Local Plan: Spatial Options Document 2021

Representation ID: 38420

Received: 02/09/2021

Respondent: Mr Mark Pocklington

Representation Summary:

It is teh countryside, now we can work form home, why do we need to fill this part of Essex? Hockley was a village only 40 years ago

Full text:

It is teh countryside, now we can work form home, why do we need to fill this part of Essex? Hockley was a village only 40 years ago

Object

New Local Plan: Spatial Options Document 2021

Representation ID: 38462

Received: 03/09/2021

Respondent: Mrs Diana Abrams

Representation Summary:

As mentioned previously the area is crammed as it is, we need open spaces not more houses.

Full text:

As mentioned previously the area is crammed as it is, we need open spaces not more houses.

Support

New Local Plan: Spatial Options Document 2021

Representation ID: 38484

Received: 04/09/2021

Respondent: Miss Rosie Williamson

Representation Summary:

In summary Rawal Pindi Nursery site Hawkwell is the perfect site to be considered for development as it ticks many boxes. We should be looking at more sites locally like this rather than huge sites in our much importnant countryside.

Full text:

I write with reference to the recent outlined areas for potential development.

I was devastated to see so many of our green spaces being considered for re development.

I imagine that most people that reside in Hockley and close surrounding areas bought their properties due to the location, community and access to these green open spaces separating us from much larger towns.

Hockley is already being affected by the conversion of all local schools to sit under a corporate umbrella, and soon will not retain any of its charm, individuality or what makes it a unique place to live.

The proposed developments not only will compromise what makes Hockley so desirable, it is only likely to encourage people who are moving from much vaster populated areas as opposed to housing growth from existing residents.

We will all be affected by the roads in terms of congestion. The conditions of these roads cannot be managed currently so I dread to think what the effects of the additional thousands of vehicles will do to them. The more concerning factor is the likely effect on the air quality for all residents, particularly those on main road locations.

I do recognise that there needs to be some allowances for growth, to meet government targets and cater for the future generations, so with this in mind I have identified a site that I do not object to in principle.

I can see that site for Rawal Pindi has been put forward. This is an infill plot that is not accessible to the public, and will have much less impact on the community than the field opposite that has also been suggested, and of which I am completely opposed to.

Infill plots, garden plots or the removal of one residence in place of a few will have far less impact than destroying well loved and utilised spaces.

With regards to the Rawal Pindi site, I do have a few minor concerns. I can see the current building is not well maintained, which leads me to believe that there would be significant areas of overgrowth in the proposed development site. I would therefore like to see a dedicated area within the development for housing any displaced wildlife.

While I agree that a well designed site would have more kerb appeal I also think that the houses should be built as sustainably as possible and that any plans submitted for the district should be made to list considerations to the environment as such. If our village has to allow for this then we should be taking responsibility for how this is undertaken and making any prospective developers also provide evidence of such.

I understand that larger sites may be favourable to the council as they can fulfil quotas and provide the additional resources needed for the increase in community, but I am also aware that large scale developers use loopholes to circumnavigate providing what is required and promised. While I acknowledge that smaller developers are not required to provide these resources, they are putting significantly less pressure on the current provisions than the likes of developments such as Hall Road, Rochford which fail to provide anything. Any increase to provisions within the area utilising the ‘smaller developer’ method will lead to reduced pressure across all existing resources, rather than just level with the population growth.

I also acknowledge that larger companies have the ability to take decisions opposing their developments to appeals and that they have a good chance of succeeding however these are not people that have ever resided in our area nor intend to live within any of the communities that they affect. This again is why I would support smaller developers as I do not believe these to have the entirely same agenda.

I hope that you navigate your considerations and decisions towards sites such as Rawal Pindi rathe

Comment

New Local Plan: Spatial Options Document 2021

Representation ID: 38487

Received: 04/09/2021

Respondent: SE Essex Organic Gardeners

Representation Summary:

The area is already developed, even over-developed?

Full text:

The area is already developed, even over-developed?

Support

New Local Plan: Spatial Options Document 2021

Representation ID: 38504

Received: 05/09/2021

Respondent: Mr Robert Jones

Representation Summary:

Assessment areaAA78(49 & P45) seems to be an ideal location for a small but significant addition to local housing stock. I am familiar with the existing residents of this area who are in favour of development by a local builder. It is a logical extension of recent surrounding developments and would improve the appearance of what is rapidly becoming derelict.
The now closed nursery used to generate considerable extra traffic on the B1013 so a modest number of houses with good access would be unlikely to be much different.
This development would allow the B1013 to become the greenbelt boundary.

Full text:

Assessment areaAA78(49 & P45) seems to be an ideal location for a small but significant addition to local housing stock. I am familiar with the existing residents of this area who are in favour of development by a local builder. It is a logical extension of recent surrounding developments and would improve the appearance of what is rapidly becoming derelict.
The now closed nursery used to generate considerable extra traffic on the B1013 so a modest number of houses with good access would be unlikely to be much different.
This development would allow the B1013 to become the greenbelt boundary.

Comment

New Local Plan: Spatial Options Document 2021

Representation ID: 38633

Received: 07/09/2021

Respondent: Mr Wayne Quamina

Representation Summary:

CFS082 Has less housing already in situ thus reduced strain on local community and no over population of a small area.

Full text:

CFS082 Has less housing already in situ thus reduced strain on local community and no over population of a small area.

Object

New Local Plan: Spatial Options Document 2021

Representation ID: 38677

Received: 08/09/2021

Respondent: mr justin osborne

Representation Summary:

No! Stop building new housing within this area, it's hard enough with the infrastructure as it is!! If any councilors actually lived deep within hockley they would know the hassle it is getting out every morning and returning every evening! And you want to add to that??

Full text:

No! Stop building new housing within this area, it's hard enough with the infrastructure as it is!! If any councilors actually lived deep within hockley they would know the hassle it is getting out every morning and returning every evening! And you want to add to that??

Support

New Local Plan: Spatial Options Document 2021

Representation ID: 38697

Received: 10/09/2021

Respondent: Mrs Kim Curbishley

Representation Summary:

The industrial areas and unused office areas around the perimeter of the village .

Full text:

The industrial areas and unused office areas around the perimeter of the village .

Object

New Local Plan: Spatial Options Document 2021

Representation ID: 38827

Received: 14/09/2021

Respondent: Stuart Watson

Representation Summary:

None that are greenbelt. No further development should take place on green belt sites. These should all be removed from the local plan.

Full text:

None that are greenbelt. No further development should take place on green belt sites. These should all be removed from the local plan.

Comment

New Local Plan: Spatial Options Document 2021

Representation ID: 38951

Received: 16/09/2021

Respondent: Mrs kathryn Gilbert

Representation Summary:

As before not without the infrastructure in place first.

Full text:

As before not without the infrastructure in place first.