MM78

Showing comments and forms 1 to 1 of 1

Comment

Allocations: Schedule of modifications

Representation ID: 33061

Received: 10/01/2014

Respondent: Raven Group

Agent: Pomery Planning Consultants

Representation Summary:

Therefore, the minor modification proposed should also include text, which requires the master plan to be submitted that deals with the integration of the various sites including the wildlife site and its boundaries and extent and should form part of outline planning application, otherwise any master plan submitted for the area will lack status in the long term.

Full text:

The respondent supports the need for a master plan to be prepared prior to the submission of a planning application. However, for the master plan to have any lasting status, it should be submitted as part of an outline planning application, which could also include integration with the proposed employment site NEL 2 (previously NEL 3) and a defined site boundary for the local wildlife site.
Therefore, the minor modification proposed should also include text, which requires the master plan to be submitted that deals with the integration of the various sites including the wildlife site and its boundaries and extent and should form part of outline planning application, otherwise any master plan submitted for the area will lack status in the long term.