MM68
Comment
Allocations: Schedule of modifications
Representation ID: 33076
Received: 12/01/2014
Respondent: Mr Alan Chadwick
The development of 49 houses on this site would be a high density build and the infrastructure of the village could not cope. Also the development would have a significant impact so close to the conversation area of the Church and surrounding conversation area and the village is already overcrowded as it is.
The development of 49 houses on this site would be a high density build and the infrastructure of the village could not cope. Also the development would have a significant impact so close to the conversation area of the Church and surrounding conversation area and the village is already overcrowded as it is.
Support
Allocations: Schedule of modifications
Representation ID: 33098
Received: 12/01/2014
Respondent: Mr Dennis Haggerty
Entirely proportionate with the number of dwellings given the abundant green space in the village and access to public footpaths immediately adjacent to the site of the development
Entirely proportionate with the number of dwellings given the abundant green space in the village and access to public footpaths immediately adjacent to the site of the development
Object
Allocations: Schedule of modifications
Representation ID: 33157
Received: 14/01/2014
Respondent: Mr Mike Wright
Space for the new homes will be limited within a development of this size and not in keeping with the village or the council's original planning report, which included a community play area.
Cramming more homes into a smaller plot of land would not be in keeping with the village or the sensitive positioning of this plot of land in relation to the church and conservation area.
Space for the new homes will be limited within a development of this size and not in keeping with the village or the council's original planning report, which included a community play area.
Cramming more homes into a smaller plot of land would not be in keeping with the village or the sensitive positioning of this plot of land in relation to the church and conservation area.
Object
Allocations: Schedule of modifications
Representation ID: 33164
Received: 14/01/2014
Respondent: Mr Arthur Cundick
Space for the new homes will be limited within the development of this size and not in keeping with the village or the council's original planning report,which included a community play area.
Cramming more homes into a smaller plot of land would not be in keeping the village.or the sensitive positioning of this plot of land.
Space for the new homes will be limited within the development of this size and not in keeping with the village or the council's original planning report,which included a community play area.
Cramming more homes into a smaller plot of land would not be in keeping the village.or the sensitive positioning of this plot of land.
Comment
Allocations: Schedule of modifications
Representation ID: 33172
Received: 14/01/2014
Respondent: Mr Stan Costin
We object to the proposal for the following reasons.
1.Loss of green belt area
2. 49 houses is not in keeeping with the surrounding area and will de-value existing properties. The area has mainly detached properties which is in keeping with the rest of the village
3. The current infrastructure is now at its maximum eg schools, roads, transport,doctors and the main one the sewage system, this will only compound the existing problems.
4.The view to and from the church would be obstructed- this is an historical church and should not be obstructed
5. Only single storie properties should be considered
We object to the proposal for the following reasons.
1.Loss of green belt area
2. 49 houses is not in keeeping with the surrounding area and will de-value existing properties. The area has mainly detached properties which is in keeping with the rest of the village
3. The current infrastructure is now at its maximum eg schools, roads, transport,doctors and the main one the sewage system, this will only compound the existing problems.
4.The view to and from the church would be obstructed- this is an historical church and should not be obstructed
5. Only single storie properties should be considered
Object
Allocations: Schedule of modifications
Representation ID: 33191
Received: 14/01/2014
Respondent: Mr Tom Glover
This number of houses suggested for this plot is not low density and a development of this size within a plot of land of this scale will have a negative impact on the conservation area, the views up to the church from the primary route into the village and is not in keeping with the village.
Development of 49 homes within this area would not be low density development as expected within rural and village communities.
The development of a higher density number of homes compared to the original proposals for this plot of land would have a significant impact so close to the conservation area of the Church and surrounding conservation area. A lower number of dwellings would reduce the impact to the village community, the conservation area and the view of the village from the south and up to the church. Space for the new homes will be limited within a development of this size and not in keeping with the village or the Council's original planning report, which included a community play area. Cramming more homes into a smaller plot of land would not be in keeping with the village or the sensitive positioning of this plot of land in relation to the Church and conservation area.
Object
Allocations: Schedule of modifications
Representation ID: 33267
Received: 16/01/2014
Respondent: Mr Keith Williams
Space for the proposed new homes will be limited within a development of this size and not in keeping with the council's original planning report, which included a community play area. Cramming more homes on to a smaller plot of land would not be in keeping with the existing village or the sensitive positioning of this plot of land in relation to the church and conservation area.
Space for the proposed new homes will be limited within a development of this size and not in keeping with the council's original planning report, which included a community play area. Cramming more homes on to a smaller plot of land would not be in keeping with the existing village or the sensitive positioning of this plot of land in relation to the church and conservation area.
Object
Allocations: Schedule of modifications
Representation ID: 33341
Received: 16/01/2014
Respondent: Mrs Lyn Sinden
I object to this on the grounds that space for new homes will be limited within a development of this size and not in keeping with the village or the Council's original planning report, which included a community play area. Cramming more homes into a smaller plot of land would not be in keeping with the village or the sensitve positioning of this plot of land in relation to the Church and conservtion area. A play area should be included in the plans.
I object to this on the grounds that space for new homes will be limited within a development of this size and not in keeping with the village or the Council's original planning report, which included a community play area. Cramming more homes into a smaller plot of land would not be in keeping with the village or the sensitve positioning of this plot of land in relation to the Church and conservtion area. A play area should be included in the plans.
Object
Allocations: Schedule of modifications
Representation ID: 33389
Received: 16/01/2014
Respondent: Benjamin Gibson
49 homes within this area would not be low density.
The development is too close to the conservation area of the Church. A lower number of dwellings would reduce the impact to the village community, the and the view of the village from the south up to the church.
This is not in keeping with the village or the Council's original planning report, which included a community play area - more homes into a smaller area would not be in keeping with the village or the sensitive positioning of this plot of land in relation to the Church and the conservation area.
My objection to the proposal is based on the following grounds;
1) Development of 49 homes within this area would not be low density development as expected within rural village communities
2) The development of a higher density number of homes compared to the original proposals for this plot oof land would have a significant impact so close to the conservation area of the Church and surrounding area. A lower number of dwellings would reduce the impact to the village community, the conservation area and the view of the village from the south up to the church.
3) Space for new homes will be limited within a development of this size and not in keeping with the village or the Council's original planning report, which included a community play area. Cramming more homes into a smaller area would not be in keeping with the village or the sensitive positioning of this plot of land in relation to the Church and the conservation area.
Object
Allocations: Schedule of modifications
Representation ID: 33393
Received: 16/01/2014
Respondent: Miss Sarah Johnson
I am not against the development entirely, I am against where the proposed site will be. There is more suitable land available to build houses on, on the opposite side of the road, why put it in front of the church? My daughter will grow up in the village and it will be nice for her in the future to look across the fields and see St Nicholas Church and not have her view blocked by houses.
I am not against the development entirely, I am against where the proposed site will be. There is more suitable land available to build houses on, on the opposite side of the road, why put it in front of the church? My daughter will grow up in the village and it will be nice for her in the future to look across the fields and see St Nicholas Church and not have her view blocked by houses.
Object
Allocations: Schedule of modifications
Representation ID: 33414
Received: 17/01/2014
Respondent: Mrs Laura Cripps
The limit of 49 dwellings is not a low density number as would be expected in a rural/village community.
The limit of 49 dwellings is not a low density number as would be expected in a rural/village community.
Object
Allocations: Schedule of modifications
Representation ID: 33418
Received: 17/01/2014
Respondent: Mrs Rachael Glover
Development of 49 homes within this area would not be low density development as expected within rural and village communities. The development of a higher density number of homes compared to the original proposals for this plot of land would have a significant impact so close to the conservation area of the Church and surrounding conservation area. A lower number of dwellings would reduce the impact to the village community, the conservation area and the view of the village from the south and up to the church.
Development of 49 homes within this area would not be low density development as expected within rural and village communities. The development of a higher density number of homes compared to the original proposals for this plot of land would have a significant impact so close to the conservation area of the Church and surrounding conservation area. A lower number of dwellings would reduce the impact to the village community, the conservation area and the view of the village from the south and up to the church.
Object
Allocations: Schedule of modifications
Representation ID: 33424
Received: 17/01/2014
Respondent: Ms Anita Cope-Prior
The council's original planning report included a community play area, how will this be possible when space for new homes will be limited within a development of this size? Cramming more homes into a smaller plot of land would not be in keeping with the village or the sensitive positioning of the plot, bearing in mind it's location to the church and conservation area.
The council's original planning report included a community play area, how will this be possible when space for new homes will be limited within a development of this size? Cramming more homes into a smaller plot of land would not be in keeping with the village or the sensitive positioning of the plot, bearing in mind it's location to the church and conservation area.