Policy T2 - Access to Saxon Business Park

Support

Representation ID: 32237

Received: 03/04/2013

Respondent: Mr G P Nicholls

As previous as my support

Object

Representation ID: 32529

Received: 25/04/2013

Respondent: Mr Peter Symes

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Too many roads all at capacity and a development like this in the middle. RDC and SBC won't be satisfied until the whole area is concreted over. Perhaps and offshore airport would be better in actually releasing some of the pressure to build in a over-developed region

Support

Representation ID: 32564

Received: 26/04/2013

Respondent: Mr. Terence DAVIES

I SUPPORT THIS. I have nothing to add concerning this particular heading that I didn't say in the previous JAAP consultation, to leave as 'No Comments' gives the impression that the writer could be a 'Don't Know' and has not got a view either way. Those who do not comment must be assumed to be in favour; however, those who object will choose not interpret it as such. Who the heck compiled this document?

Support

Representation ID: 32620

Received: 15/04/2013

Respondent: Essex County Council

The County Council has participated in joint discussions with the two authorities of Rochford and Southend-on-Sea at each stage of plan preparation in regard to the highways and transportation aspects of the Plan. As a result, the County Council welcomes the proposed approach to the delivery of infrastructure and transport interventions set out within the Plan. However, there will be a need to continue to clearly understand the phasing of these interventions and how the works will be funded as the proposed development progresses.