Policy MRO3 - Southern MRO Zone

Showing comments and forms 1 to 4 of 4

Support

London Southend Airport and Environs Joint Area Action Plan Submission Document

Representation ID: 32233

Received: 03/04/2013

Respondent: Mr G P Nicholls

Representation Summary:

Again an area of long needed investment and modernisation

Full text:

Again an area of long needed investment and modernisation

Object

London Southend Airport and Environs Joint Area Action Plan Submission Document

Representation ID: 32355

Received: 10/04/2013

Respondent: mrs june carr

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Please do not put any of the building right on top of the houses in wells ave we have enough to contend with put them on the industrial side

Full text:

Please do not put any of the building right on top of the houses in wells ave we have enough to contend with put them on the industrial side

Object

London Southend Airport and Environs Joint Area Action Plan Submission Document

Representation ID: 32519

Received: 25/04/2013

Respondent: Mr Peter Symes

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

No consideration of wider impact

Full text:

No consideration of wider impact

Support

London Southend Airport and Environs Joint Area Action Plan Submission Document

Representation ID: 32560

Received: 26/04/2013

Respondent: Mr. Terence DAVIES

Representation Summary:

I SUPPORT THIS. I have nothing to add concerning this particular heading that I didn't say in the previous JAAP consultation, to leave as 'No Comments' gives the impression that the writer could be a 'Don't Know' and has not got a view either way. Those who do not comment must be assumed to be in favour; however, those who object will choose not interpret it as such. Who the heck compiled this document?

Full text:

I SUPPORT THIS. I have nothing to add concerning this particular heading that I didn't say in the previous JAAP consultation, to leave as 'No Comments' gives the impression that the writer could be a 'Don't Know' and has not got a view either way. Those who do not comment must be assumed to be in favour; however, those who object will choose not interpret it as such. Who the heck compiled this document?