Policy TF1 - Expansion of New Terminal
Object
London Southend Airport and Environs Joint Area Action Plan Submission Document
Representation ID: 32025
Received: 19/03/2013
Respondent: South East Essex Friends of the Earth
Legally compliant? No
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Work on a second terminal building was started by LSA without planning permission and no action has been taken by the local authorities. There is also a appalling lack of planning regarding the capacity of the sewage network surrounding the airport.
Policy TF1 talks about the terminal expansion in the future tense, ignoring the fact that LSA are well on the way to completing it. Work was started on the second new terminal building without Planning Permission, demonstrating a lack of control by the local authorities. No action has been taken against the airport for this breach of planning law, demonstrating that LSA's assumption that they have the local authorities on their side was correct. The local authorities should pay greater attention to the need to properly and safely discharge sewage and other effluent. The current plans are woefully inadequate and may result in sewage backing up into the homes of local residents - a serious health threat.
Support
London Southend Airport and Environs Joint Area Action Plan Submission Document
Representation ID: 32093
Received: 22/03/2013
Respondent: Mr Tom Clark
I believe the cap on movements of 53,300 is effective at containing the growth at he airport, and that if the airport is able to handle more than 2 million passengers per year in the xpanded terminal, that it should not be capped by any Council imposed limit that would stultify the new found success of this great asset in the sub-region. If a cap on passenger numbers is considered appropriate, it should be in the region of 5 million pax. per annum.
I believe the cap on movements of 53,300 is effective at containing the growth at he airport, and that if the airport is able to handle more than 2 million passengers per year in the xpanded terminal, that it should not be capped by any Council imposed limit that would stultify the new found success of this great asset in the sub-region. If a cap on passenger numbers is considered appropriate, it should be in the region of 5 million pax. per annum.
Support
London Southend Airport and Environs Joint Area Action Plan Submission Document
Representation ID: 32230
Received: 03/04/2013
Respondent: Mr G P Nicholls
The airport operators are at present extending the new terminal but again if further expansion is required in future years this should be allowed
The airport operators are at present extending the new terminal but again if further expansion is required in future years this should be allowed
Object
London Southend Airport and Environs Joint Area Action Plan Submission Document
Representation ID: 32257
Received: 04/04/2013
Respondent: mr mark williams
Legally compliant? No
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
the area cannot take a airport of this size
the area cannot take a airport of this size
Object
London Southend Airport and Environs Joint Area Action Plan Submission Document
Representation ID: 32265
Received: 04/04/2013
Respondent: Mr Chris Williams
Legally compliant? No
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Further development means further increase in noise, air traffic, night flights with no real solutio from the airport on how they intend to manage and approach the inconvenience and disruption caused by increase in activity
Further development means further increase in noise, air traffic, night flights with no real solutio from the airport on how they intend to manage and approach the inconvenience and disruption caused by increase in activity
Object
London Southend Airport and Environs Joint Area Action Plan Submission Document
Representation ID: 32298
Received: 06/04/2013
Respondent: Mrs Catherine Theobald
Legally compliant? No
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
This proposal is already out of date, since it would appear that work has already begun on the extension to the terminal, perhaps under the heading of permitted development. It is going ahead with plans to accommodate 2 million passengers per annum, but without proper attention paid to the need for adequate sewage and fresh water arrangements. The surrounding area has already had problems apparently, due to the increase in local housing, and doubts have been expressed, ignored by Southend Council, whose responsibility it is, that the current piping, etc can cope with the increase in usage.
This proposal is already out of date, since it would appear that work has already begun on the extension to the terminal, perhaps under the heading of permitted development. It is going ahead with plans to accommodate 2 million passengers per annum, but without proper attention paid to the need for adequate sewage and fresh water arrangements. The surrounding area has already had problems apparently, due to the increase in local housing, and doubts have been expressed, ignored by Southend Council, whose responsibility it is, that the current piping, etc can cope with the increase in usage.
Object
London Southend Airport and Environs Joint Area Action Plan Submission Document
Representation ID: 32409
Received: 21/04/2013
Respondent: mrs jackie hopper
Legally compliant? No
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
I do not support any expansion of the terminal as I believe the target vision of 2 million passengers is ridiculous for this small airport & the surrounding locality. The airport is nestled in a heavily populated residential area & too many people will be adversely affected by the consequential noise & pollution by such a preposterous increase
I do not support any expansion of the terminal as I believe the target vision of 2 million passengers is ridiculous for this small airport & the surrounding locality. The airport is nestled in a heavily populated residential area & too many people will be adversely affected by the consequential noise & pollution by such a preposterous increase
Object
London Southend Airport and Environs Joint Area Action Plan Submission Document
Representation ID: 32420
Received: 21/04/2013
Respondent: mr mark hopper
Legally compliant? No
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
I do not support any expansion of the terminal as I believe the target vision of 2 million passengers is ridiculous for this small airport & the surrounding locality. The airport is nestled in a heavily populated residential area & too many people will be adversely affected by the consequential noise & pollution by such a preposterous increase
I do not support any expansion of the terminal as I believe the target vision of 2 million passengers is ridiculous for this small airport & the surrounding locality. The airport is nestled in a heavily populated residential area & too many people will be adversely affected by the consequential noise & pollution by such a preposterous increase
Object
London Southend Airport and Environs Joint Area Action Plan Submission Document
Representation ID: 32458
Received: 23/04/2013
Respondent: Mrs C Mann
Legally compliant? No
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Work on a second terminal building was started by LSA without planning permission and no action has been taken by the local authorities. There is also an appalling lack of planning regarding the capacity of the sewage network surrounding the airport.
Policy TF1 talks about the terminal expansion in the future tense, ignoring the fact that LSA are well on the way to completing it. Work was started on the second new terminal building without Planning Permission, demonstrating a lack of control by the local authorities. No action has been taken against the airport for this breach of planning law, demonstrating that LSA's assumption that they have the local authorities on their side was correct. The local authorities should pay greater attention to the need to properly and safely discharge sewage and other effluent. The current plans are woefully inadequate and may result in sewage backing up into the homes of local residents - a serious health threat.
Object
London Southend Airport and Environs Joint Area Action Plan Submission Document
Representation ID: 32498
Received: 25/04/2013
Respondent: Mr David Baker
Legally compliant? No
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
The current air quality around Warners Bridge Chase is already very poor whenever a plane is allowed to leave its engines running while parked close to the railway / resedetial area. This occurs several times each day. Any increase in this would be totlly unacceptable and will adversley affect residents health.
The current air quality around Warners Bridge Chase is already very poor whenever a plane is allowed to leave its engines running while parked close to the railway / resedetial area. This occurs several times each day. Any increase in this would be totlly unacceptable and will adversley affect residents health.
Object
London Southend Airport and Environs Joint Area Action Plan Submission Document
Representation ID: 32517
Received: 25/04/2013
Respondent: Mr Peter Symes
Legally compliant? No
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Can't be granted without consideration of previous points. Already Stobart have progressed with expansion before permission granted
Can't be granted without consideration of previous points. Already Stobart have progressed with expansion before permission granted
Support
London Southend Airport and Environs Joint Area Action Plan Submission Document
Representation ID: 32558
Received: 26/04/2013
Respondent: Mr. Terence DAVIES
I SUPPORT THIS. I have nothing to add concerning this particular heading that I didn't say in the previous JAAP consultation, to leave as 'No Comments' gives the impression that the writer could be a 'Don't Know' and has not got a view either way. Those who do not comment must be assumed to be in favour; however, those who object will choose not interpret it as such. Who the heck compiled this document?
I SUPPORT THIS. I have nothing to add concerning this particular heading that I didn't say in the previous JAAP consultation, to leave as 'No Comments' gives the impression that the writer could be a 'Don't Know' and has not got a view either way. Those who do not comment must be assumed to be in favour; however, those who object will choose not interpret it as such. Who the heck compiled this document?
Object
London Southend Airport and Environs Joint Area Action Plan Submission Document
Representation ID: 32616
Received: 16/04/2013
Respondent: Ms Alexis Kennedy
Legally compliant? Yes
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
I have no idea at this juncture and without seeking legal advice, what is and isn't unsound with the DPD.
What I do know is I bought this property for my mother several years ago and she moved in expecting it to be the last house she lived in. Please look at where her house is situated. This is an urgent problem and has caused her a serious lack of quality of life, mainly health issues. Even the landing lights are opposite her bedroom window and the noise, air quality, safety and dilapidation of the property due to cracks in the structure because of being located directly under the flight path, due to wake and turbulence and vortex damage.
I am devastated at witnessing her failing health which has been attributed to living directly under the flight path and being a victim to all the factors mentioned above.
I have no idea at this juncture and without seeking legal advice, what is and isn't unsound with the DPD.
What I do know is I bought this property for my mother several years ago and she moved in expecting it to be the last house she lived in. Please look at where her house is situated. This is an urgent problem and has caused her a serious lack of quality of life, mainly health issues. Even the landing lights are opposite her bedroom window and the noise, air quality, safety and dilapidation of the property due to cracks in the structure because of being located directly under the flight path, due to wake and turbulence and vortex damage.
I am devastated at witnessing her failing health which has been attributed to living directly under the flight path and being a victim to all the factors mentioned above.