Policy LS8 - Air Quality Monitoring

Object

Representation ID: 32024

Received: 19/03/2013

Respondent: South East Essex Friends of the Earth

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

In the light of the significant threat to health caused by poor air quality the JAAP should be strengthened to ensure that air quality is effectively and accurately measured in the roads leading to the airport (in Rochford District and the Borough of Southend). The JAAP should detail what steps will be taken to reduce traffic if air quality standards are not met.

Support

Representation ID: 32229

Received: 03/04/2013

Respondent: Mr G P Nicholls

The airport should be supported in everyway if they are to expand to there targets with employment been paramount in this case

Support

Representation ID: 32268

Received: 04/04/2013

Respondent: Mr Chris Williams

However independant and stringent monitoring as the pollution created by low flying jets needs to be tackled and addressed as residence in the surrounding area are being subjected to increased pollution of air since larger jets have been operated out of the airport.

Object

Representation ID: 32287

Received: 05/04/2013

Respondent: Mrs Catherine Theobald

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

The air operator does not seem to be obliged to publish the information regarding the siting of equipment or the data collected. It does not clearly indicate what should be done in the event of air quality not reaching the required standards

Support

Representation ID: 32356

Received: 10/04/2013

Respondent: mrs june carr

the air quality sometimes the smell of the aircarft fuel is overpowering surely this is harmful in such a built up area i support the air quality monitoring if i tick support it dosnt mean i agree with the bad air quality these questions seem to be made to trip people up into agreeing to everything you propose why cant you just stated for or against or is that too easy

Object

Representation ID: 32408

Received: 21/04/2013

Respondent: mrs jackie hopper

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

an independent body should be monitoring air pollution NOT the airport itself. How can the results be trusted when it is in the vested interests of the airport to show low pollution levels.

Object

Representation ID: 32421

Received: 21/04/2013

Respondent: mr mark hopper

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

an independent body should be monitoring air pollution NOT the airport itself. How can the results be trusted when it is in the vested interests of the airport to show low pollution levels.

Object

Representation ID: 32457

Received: 23/04/2013

Respondent: Mrs C Mann

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

In the light of the significant threat to health caused by poor air quality the JAAP should be strengthened to ensure that air quality is effectively and accurately measured in the roads leading to the airport (in Rochford District and the Borough of Southend). The JAAP should detail what steps will be taken to reduce traffic if air quality standards are not met.

Object

Representation ID: 32500

Received: 25/04/2013

Respondent: Mr David Baker

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Air quality sampling at "periodic intervals" is insufficient as they will inevitably miss the worst of the adready bad polution.

Object

Representation ID: 32516

Received: 25/04/2013

Respondent: Mr Peter Symes

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

No measures for controlling the operator for failure to comply.

We get sorry and they carry on

Support

Representation ID: 32557

Received: 26/04/2013

Respondent: Mr. Terence DAVIES

I SUPPORT THIS. I have nothing to add concerning this particular heading. To leave as 'No Comments' gives the impression that the writer could be a 'Don't Know' and has not got a view either way. Those who do not comment must be assumed to be in favour, however, those who object will not interpret it as such. Who the heck compiled this document?