DM16 Extensions to Dwellings in the Green Belt - Preferred Option

This is effectively a reduction in the amount a green belt property can be extended using a planning application for all properties under 140M. RDC state here that it is entirely reasonable for those living in the greenbelt to be able to extend their properties. Under RDC's current policy it is possible to extend by 35M. Under this proposed policy all properties under 140m will be allowed to extend to less of a deree than the current policy. Why is it necessary to reduce the amount that properties in the greenbelt can be extended by if they are under 140M? Also this cut for properties in the greenbelt extension threshold should be stated as a cut! How was the figure of 25% worked out?

25% is less than the previous policy. RDC may want the proposed development to result in a better design and less impact on the openess of the greenbelt, this proposed policy however will have the exact opposite effect as it encorages people to use permitted development rather that making a formal planning application. Also the 25% figure makes it less attractive to use roofspace in bungalows than the old policy for properties 140m and under. This will encorage extensions as opposed to using roofspace, and that means a bigger footprint on the ground. More than 25% is required.

The rules are so disproportionate - existing dwellings in the greenbelt can't extend more than 25% but we have a number of new builds in the greenbelt that have very large footprints to start with and their neighbours in a more modest older dwelling are unable to increase the footprint even given they have a very large area of surrounding land. There is no consistency in any areas of our districts greenbelt dwellings; what passes today will be rejected tomorrow for a neighbouring household.

Policy should be to extend dwellings up to maximum floor area achievable with permitted development rights. This policy is counterproductive as it will encourage owners to use their pd rights to build flat roofed extensions. This will result in buildings with vastly increased floorspace and of unsightly appearance. Dwellings with smaller footprints and steeper pitched roofs are far more traditional, far more attractive visually and less detrimental to the Green Belt.