12.37

Showing comments and forms 1 to 1 of 1

Object

Core Strategy Submission Document

Representation ID: 15732

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Mr J Wiseman

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

UNSOUND , NO VIABLE TRAVEL PLAN , NOT IN KEEPING WITH VIBRANT LOCAL SHOPS , DESTRUCTION OF QUALITY OF LIFE INCREASED POLLUTION , CONGESTION

Full text:

UNSOUND. THE MENTION OF LARGE MUTLIPLES IS CONFUSING.WITHIN 5 MILES WE HAVE 4 LARGE SUPERMARKETS IT IS THEREFORE AN UNNECESSARY DEVELOPMENT WITH NO VIABLE TRANSPORT PLAN FOR ALREADY OVERSTRETCHED RD B1013 THAT HAS TAILBACKS EVERY RUSH HOUR.IT REGULARLY TAKES 10-15 MINTUES TO NEGOTIATE SPA ROUNDABOUT IN RUSH HOURS

WILL LEAD TO INCREASED POLLUTION AND CONGESTION.

REGULARLY IN THE PRESS IT IS BEMOANED THAT EVERY HIGH ST LOOKS THE SAME WITH A CONSTANT ATTACK ON THE LOCAL INDEPENDENTS BY THE LARGE MULTIPLES YET THIS IS WHAT THE COUNCIL APPEARS TO WANT.LARGE MULTIPLES BRING LITTLE MONEY INTO THE LOCAL ECONOMY BUT THEY DO DESTROY LOCAL BUSINESSES AND AS MOST OF THE EMPLOYEES AND EMPOLYERS ARE LOCALS THIS LEADS TO MONEY LEAVING THE LOCAL ECONOMY AND BEING SUCKED OUT INTO OFFSHORE TAX EFFICIENT COMPANIES