7.9
Object
Core Strategy Submission Document
Representation ID: 15740
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: Steven Abbott Associates North Quarry Office
Legally compliant? Yes
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Whilst the existence of Essex Marina is explicitly recognised there is no mention of Baltic Wharf and associated storage facilties (which lie alongside the Essex Marina). In physical and visual terms Baltic Wharf is more substantial and significant. Indeed the Wharf and storage facilty was identified in the Richfird District Replacement Local Plan as major developed site in the Green Belt. That recognition and identification should be carried forward. The redevelopment potential of the wharf site (as per PPG2 Annex C) should be recognised.
Whilst the existence of Essex Marina is explicitly recognised there is no mention of Baltic Wharf and associated storage facilties (which lie alongside the Essex Marina). In physical and visual terms Baltic Wharf is more substantial and significant. Indeed the Wharf and storage facilty was identified in the Richfird District Replacement Local Plan as major developed site in the Green Belt. That recognition and identification should be carried forward. The redevelopment potential of the wharf site (as per PPG2 Annex C) should be recognised.