Policy GB2 - Rural Diversification and Recreational Uses

Showing comments and forms 1 to 3 of 3

Object

Core Strategy Submission Document

Representation ID: 15884

Received: 25/11/2009

Respondent: Whirledge & Nott

Agent: Whirledge & Nott

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

I consider that Policy GB2 is Unsound as it is inconsistent with national policy, namely Planning Policy Statement 7.

There is no statement within PPS7 that retail or residential developments are unacceptable forms of development in the countryside. Paragraph 17 of PPS7 states that "re-use for economic development purposes will usually be preferable, but residentail conversions may be more appropriate in some locations and for some buildings" It is therefore inconsistent to prevent retail and residential development as acceptable forms of farm diversification. This restriction is over bearing and unecessary in realtion to re-use of buildings and rural divesification.

Full text:

I consider that Policy GB2 is Unsound as it is inconsistent with national policy, namely Planning Policy Statement 7.

There is no statement within PPS7 that retail or residential developments are unacceptable forms of development in the countryside. Paragraph 17 of PPS7 states that "re-use for economic development purposes will usually be preferable, but residentail conversions may be more appropriate in some locations and for some buildings" It is therefore inconsistent to prevent retail and residential development as acceptable forms of farm diversification. This restriction is over bearing and unecessary in realtion to re-use of buildings and rural divesification.

Support

Core Strategy Submission Document

Representation ID: 15979

Received: 28/10/2009

Respondent: Go-East

Representation Summary:

There appears to be some overlap between both Green Belt policies. There may be an opportunity to combine both into one policy with clear explanatory text.

Full text:

There appears to be some overlap between both Green Belt policies. There may be an opportunity to combine both into one policy with clear explanatory text.

Support

Core Strategy Submission Document

Representation ID: 16041

Received: 28/10/2009

Respondent: Rochford & District Chamber of Trade & Commerce

Representation Summary:

Relax "restrictive" concept with regard to diversification. Encourage re-use of empty unoccupied and redundant farm buildings. Actively encourage bed and breakfast and small scale hotels.

Full text:

Relax "restrictive" concept with regard to diversification. Encourage re-use of empty unoccupied and redundant farm buildings. Actively encourage bed and breakfast and small scale hotels.