6.3

Showing comments and forms 1 to 2 of 2

Object

Core Strategy Submission Document

Representation ID: 16090

Received: 29/10/2009

Respondent: Rayleigh Town Council

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

) P65 Para.6.3 The majority of the District's 12763 hectares of Green Belt is located in the east of the District. The preference for "north of London Rd" would see the release of a disproportionate amount of green belt land in the west of the District and therefore this statement is considered to be unsound.

Full text:

) P65 Para.6.3 The majority of the District's 12763 hectares of Green Belt is located in the east of the District. The preference for "north of London Rd" would see the release of a disproportionate amount of green belt land in the west of the District and therefore this statement is considered to be unsound.

Support

Core Strategy Submission Document

Representation ID: 16374

Received: 22/10/2009

Respondent: Aber Ltd

Agent: Colliers International

Representation Summary:

Agree that the minimum amount of Green Belt is allocated to meet the District's housing need, and that the extensions to the residential envelope are in sustainable locations, and prevent the coalescence of settlements.

In addition, some Green Belt land is less worthy of continued protection, as it does not necessary contribute as strongly to the reasons for maintaining it as Green Belt.

It is interesting to note that whilst the Council will continue a restrictive policy towards employment growth in the Green Belt; this appears to contradict Policy ED4 that advises that certain locations will be released to accommodate new employment sites to compensate for the loss of locations in the existing settlements.

Full text:

Agree that the minimum amount of Green Belt is allocated to meet the District's housing need, and that the extensions to the residential envelope are in sustainable locations, and prevent the coalescence of settlements.

In addition, some Green Belt land is less worthy of continued protection, as it does not necessary contribute as strongly to the reasons for maintaining it as Green Belt.

It is interesting to note that whilst the Council will continue a restrictive policy towards employment growth in the Green Belt; this appears to contradict Policy ED4 that advises that certain locations will be released to accommodate new employment sites to compensate for the loss of locations in the existing settlements.