Policy MRO2 - Northern MRO Extension

Object

Representation ID: 9542

Received: 30/04/2009

Respondent: Mr Michael Bowles

I strongly object to expanding the airport as it will increase the pollution over the residential area and will increase the risk of accidents over the residential area from old and faulty planes.

Object

Representation ID: 9603

Received: 01/05/2009

Respondent: mrs linda matthews

i do not want increased air traffic over my house, and i dont think the infrastructure around the airport could cope with the increase in use.

Object

Representation ID: 9642

Received: 01/05/2009

Respondent: Mrs Loraine Thompson

Strongly Object on the gorunds of:
(1) Living directly under the flightpath my quality life will be severely impacted
(2) Thought the government / councils were meant to improve the environment and not poison it
(3) Road connections to Southend are already over congested
(4) All promises of increased employment opportunities in other regional airport development have never been met.
(5) The SE already has 4 international airports for passenger travel.
(6) Investing in air travel can only be short term given oil becoming scarce / expensive in the next 10 years.

Object

Representation ID: 9691

Received: 01/05/2009

Respondent: Mr Cosme Gonzalez

object

Object

Representation ID: 9704

Received: 01/05/2009

Respondent: Paul Whight

footpath and cycleways can be improved without expanding the airport and increasing the surrounding road network for even more cars and lorries.

Object

Representation ID: 9830

Received: 04/05/2009

Respondent: mr Paul Fox

With global warming we do not want a larger airport or more aeroplanes.

Object

Representation ID: 9937

Received: 07/05/2009

Respondent: mrs lilian fleming

Does this implicate the expansion of more maintenance and repair works? I have just spoken to some one who lives near the airport, the noise levels are already extremely high with revving engines and additional pollution for the surroundings. Not only that, those machines in repair often fly very low over a densely populated area.

Object

Representation ID: 10031

Received: 06/05/2009

Respondent: Ms Fern Schwartzbard

Oppose expansion and extension as stated previously.

Object

Representation ID: 10118

Received: 06/05/2009

Respondent: mrs sarah brill

MRO development not required.

Object

Representation ID: 10290

Received: 07/05/2009

Respondent: MRS SUSAN THORN

OBJECT

Object

Representation ID: 10329

Received: 07/05/2009

Respondent: MR STEVEN THORN

object

Object

Representation ID: 10370

Received: 07/05/2009

Respondent: mr kevin Mahony

I object to expansion of Southend aiport.

Object

Representation ID: 10392

Received: 07/05/2009

Respondent: mr kevin Mahony

I object to expansion of Southend aiport.

Support

Representation ID: 10580

Received: 11/05/2009

Respondent: Renaissance Southend

Renaissance Southend supports Policy MRO2 but would request the inclusion of reference to support for the provision of suitable training facilities to support aviation engineering skills as part of any development within the Airport boundary.

Object

Representation ID: 10655

Received: 08/05/2009

Respondent: Peter Mack

I object to the loss of green belt land.

Object

Representation ID: 10678

Received: 08/05/2009

Respondent: Mrs Susan Mack

I object to the proposed development of Southend Airport on the grounds of
increased noise, road traffic, night flights, loss of green belt, pollution
and the loss of amenity of thousands of residents in the surrounding area
to enjoy their homes and gardens.

Object

Representation ID: 10696

Received: 08/05/2009

Respondent: Mr GEORGE COX

With global warming we do not want a larger airport or more aeroplanes.

Support

Representation ID: 10757

Received: 08/05/2009

Respondent: Mrs Louisa Reynolds

No objection to this.

Support

Representation ID: 10794

Received: 08/05/2009

Respondent: Mr Andrew Reynolds

I have no objection to increased hangerage and aircraft maintenance facilities per se, as long as it is not linked to increased flights/larger airplanes

Object

Representation ID: 10857

Received: 09/05/2009

Respondent: clive Davison

I object to expanding developing this area.

Southend is over crowded as it is - traffic appalling, too many flats being built, Town Centre is a no-go area in the evening.

Houses will be de-valued as has been seen around Stansted and the noise from the airport at night is already unacceptable.

Object

Representation ID: 10893

Received: 09/05/2009

Respondent: mrs jackie hopper

expansion of this size will create many problems to the area & quality of life of residents living there. Problems include:- unwanted increase in aircraft noise; increased road traffic resulting in further congestion on already busy roads; devaluation on many homes affected by increase in noise, traffic & pollution; increase in general air pollution; decrease in everyone's quality of life but especially to anyone unfortunate enough to live near the flight paths plus the destruction and major inconvenience of businesses & houses who happen to be in the way of this development

Object

Representation ID: 10962

Received: 10/05/2009

Respondent: Lynn Pooley

I object to the expansion and therefore every policy that relates to it.

Object

Representation ID: 11032

Received: 10/05/2009

Respondent: Mr Jason Yates

An opportunity is being missed here. This policy should only put in place if it is linked to the operation of the airport ie. restrictions in numbers of flights, noise produced, type of aircraft allowed, etc. No flights of any kind at night. I object strongly to any additional noise produced from Southend airport and if this policy contributes to this, I object to it.

Object

Representation ID: 11056

Received: 10/05/2009

Respondent: Adam Mack

I object on the following basis:
Noise pollution
Air traffic
Air pollution
Quality of life to local residents
Loss of Green Belt land
CO2 emissions/Global Warming

Object

Representation ID: 11100

Received: 10/05/2009

Respondent: Natalie Carter

I object on the following basis:
Noise pollution
Air traffic
Air pollution
Quality of life to local residents
Loss of Green Belt land
CO2 emissions/Global Warming

Object

Representation ID: 11146

Received: 10/05/2009

Respondent: Miss Erin Cronin

I object to the expansion of Southend Airport as this will mean planes low over our houses every 5 minutes at busy times, up to 30 noisy freight flights a night . A huge increase in noise and air pollution and more traffic on our congested roads. A number of people will lose their homes in the area. The value of people's homes will fall, putting even more people into negative equity. I feel there will be very few new jobs created as well as an increase in harmful greenhouse gas emissions. I therefore strongly object to the expansion.

Object

Representation ID: 11186

Received: 11/05/2009

Respondent: mrs jennifer haley

no to expansion!!!

Object

Representation ID: 11397

Received: 11/05/2009

Respondent: nanine pachy

I object to airport runway expansion.

Object

Representation ID: 11416

Received: 11/05/2009

Respondent: deborah hopper

expansion of this size will create many problems to the area; quality
of life of residents living there. Problems include:- unwanted increase in
aircraft noise; increased road traffic resulting in further congestion on
already busy roads; devaluation on many homes affected by increase in
noise, traffic &; pollution; increase in general air pollution; decrease
in everyone's quality of life but especially to anyone unfortunate enough
to live near the flight paths plus the destruction and major inconvenience
of businesses & houses who happen to be in the way of this development

Object

Representation ID: 11563

Received: 12/05/2009

Respondent: South East Essex Friends of the Earth

Further pre-judgement of planning applications in this policy. The MRO should not expand into this green open space.